|
As those of us who are greeted each morning with The
Courier, we are never surprised to see the absurd statements of our putative
U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan. Jim was at it again in Bluffton on Wednesday.
This was reported in The Courier in the Thursday, November 12, 2009
edition. I suggest that at some point this swill must stop,
unfortunately, area newspaper reporters do not have the fortitude to ask questions
or think. Let me provide a little response. You may recall that
when I ran for the Ohio House, I made some very specific statements about
health care. You may check these by visiting www.johnfkostyo.com. I paid to make
sure these were in local papers through the 76th District. Mr.
Hite has said nothing about health care – yet.
We know that the United States must fully embrace a health
care system that provides care for health, seeks to prevent illness and rewards
practices for good health. We must also embrace health care as a moral
imperative and duty to each American.
Mr. Jordan's views of health care are based on self-serving
myths and his fulfillment of a do nothing political agenda. His
statement that it is a moral question sound good, but has no basis in fact or
any morality associated with humanity. With reference to his defense of
Joe Wilson, Jim Jordan is person who is not being straightforward with his
constituents.
It is now an established fact that nearly 45,000 annual
deaths are associated with lack of health insurance, according to a new study
published on September 17, 2009 by the American Journal of Public Health. The
study, conducted at Harvard
Medical School and Cambridge
Health Alliance, found that uninsured, working-age Americans have a
40 percent higher risk of death than their privately insured counterparts, up
from a 25 percent excess death rate found in 1993. Call this whatever you want,
it is a moral statement.
Deaths associated with lack of health insurance now exceed
those caused by many common killers such as kidney disease. An increase in the
number of uninsured and an eroding medical safety net for the disadvantaged
likely explain the substantial increase in the number of deaths, as the
uninsured are more likely to go without needed care. Another factor
contributing to the widening gap in the risk of death between those who have
insurance and those who do not is the improved quality of care for those who
can get it. The study found a 40 percent increased risk of death among
the uninsured.
Steffie
Woolhandler, study co-author, professor of medicine at Harvard
Medical School, and a primary care physician at Cambridge Health Alliance,
noted: “Historically, every other developed nation has achieved universal
health care through some form of nonprofit national health insurance. Our
failure to do so means that all Americans pay higher health care costs, and
45,000 pay with their lives.”
Jim Jordan lives in a world of delusion. The United
States now ranks 31st in life expectancy according to the latest
World Health Organization figures. This puts us up with Kuwait and Chile.
The United States is 37th in infant mortality and 34th
in maternal mortality. A child in the United States is 2 1/2 times as
likely to die by age 5 as in Singapore or Sweden. An American woman is 11
times as likely to die in childbirth as a woman in Ireland. This is a
moral wrong and travesty in human terms.
I suggest that we can use common sense to provide universal
health care through a nonprofit national health plan. We can participate
in a system that rewards good health practices, that cares for health. A
system where each of us can allow the physician or medical provider of their
choice to see a comprehensive – on line - medical record. This alone
would dramatically reduce unnecessary tests, missed prescriptions, conflicting diagnosis
and decrease medical malpractice claims without demanding the forfeiture of
patient’s rights. We may not be told that our doctor is “out of network”
or that the procedure is considered “optional” without a separate
medical opinion that must be covered by the patient. How much can we save
– I suggest that the savings alone will pay for the system. The
final fact is that for those Americans below the age of 65, health care may be
questionable, for those over 65, health care improves dramatically – why –
think about it. Yes, the answer is a government run health care system –
that appears to care for health. Why should we have to wait until we are
65 years old before entitlement to that care? We need politics beyond
scare tactics and patriotically worded answers beyond tea bags.
American health care is a moral issue that when placed in
the lives of people, we “the people” do know better. Jim
Jordan – You Lie.
Respectfully, John F. Kostyo
|